Worst disaster in aviation history


“Tenerife”
By Patrick Smith

April 6, 2007 | March 27 marked the 30th anniversary of the most deadly aviation disaster in history.

Most people haven’t heard of Tenerife, a pan-shaped speck in the Atlantic. It’s one of the Canary Islands, a volcanic chain governed by the Spanish, clustered a few hundred miles off the coast of Morocco. The big town on Tenerife is Santa Cruz, and its airport, beneath a set of cascading hillsides, is called Los Rodeos. There, on March 27, 1977, two Boeing 747s — one belonging to KLM, the other to Pan Am — collided on a foggy runway. Five hundred and eighty-three people were killed. The KLM jet had commenced takeoff without permission, slamming broadside into the taxiing Pan Am jumbo as it swerved to avoid impact.

The magnitude of the catastrophe speaks for itself, but what makes it particularly unforgettable is the startling set of ironies and coincidences that preceded it. Indeed, most airplane crashes result not from a single error or failure, but from a chain of improbable errors and failures, together with a stroke or two of really bad luck. Never was this illustrated more calamitously, and almost to the point of absurdity, than on that Sunday afternoon three decades ago.

Imagine we’re there: In 1977, in only its eighth year of service, the 747 is already the biggest, most influential, and possibly the most glamorous commercial jetliner ever built. For just these reasons, it’s hard not to imagine what a story it would be — and how much carnage might result — should two of these behemoths ever hit each other. Really, though, what are the chances of that? A Hollywood script if ever there was one.

Both of the Tenerife 747s are charters. Pan Am has come from Los Angeles, with a stopover in New York; KLM from its home base in Amsterdam, Netherlands. As it happens, neither is supposed to be on Tenerife in the first place. They are scheduled to land at Las Palmas, on the nearby island of Grand Canary, where many of the passengers are on their way to meet cruise ships. After a bomb planted by Canary Island separatists explodes in the Las Palmas airport flower shop, they divert temporarily to Los Rodeos, along with several other flights, arriving around 2 p.m.

The Pan Am aircraft, registered N736PA, is no stranger to notoriety. In January 1970, this very same plane completed the inaugural commercial voyage of a 747, between New York’s Kennedy airport and London-Heathrow. Somewhere on its nose, maybe, is the dent from a champagne bottle. White with a blue window stripe, it wears the name Clipper Victor in frilly writing along the forward fuselage. The KLM 747, also blue and white, is named the Rhine.

Let’s not forget the airlines themselves: Pan Am, arguably the most storied franchise in the history of aviation, requires little introduction. KLM (Royal Dutch Airlines), for its part, is the oldest continuously operating airline in the world, founded in 1919 and highly regarded for its safety and punctuality.

The KLM captain, Jacob van Zanten, whose errant takeoff roll will soon kill nearly 600 people, including him and all 247 others on his plane, is the airline’s top 747 instructor pilot and a KLM celebrity. Passengers may recognize him in the concourse, or descending the spiral staircase of the 747’s first-class cabin. His confident visage stares out from KLM’s magazine ads. Later, when KLM executives first get word of the crash, they will attempt to contact van Zanten in hopes of sending him to Tenerife to aid the investigation team.

The normally lazy Los Rodeos is packed with diversions. The Rhine and Clipper Victor sit adjacent to each other at the southeast corner of the apron, their wingtips almost touching. Finally, at around 4 o’clock, Las Palmas begins accepting traffic again. (Imagine, today, the idea of an airport reopening within a few hours of a terrorist bombing.) Pan Am is quickly ready for departure, but the lack of room and the angle at which the jets face each other requires that KLM leave first.

The weather is fine until just before the accident, and if not for KLM requesting extra fuel at the last minute, both would be on their way sooner. During the delay, a heavy blanket of fog swoops down from the hills and envelops the airport. (That fuel also meant extra weight, affecting how quickly the 747 would, or would not, become airborne. For reasons you’ll see in a moment, that would be critical.)

Because of the tarmac congestion, the normal route to runway 30 is blocked. Departing planes will need to taxi down on the runway itself. Reaching the end, they’ll make a 180-degree turn before taking off in the opposite direction. This procedure, rare at commercial airports, is called a “back-taxi.” At Tenerife in ’77, it will put two 747s on the same runway at the same time, invisible not only to each other but to the control tower as well. The airport has no ground tracking radar.

KLM taxis ahead and onto the runway, with the Pan Am Clipper ambling several hundred yards behind. Capt. van Zanten will steer to the end, turn around, then hold until authorized for takeoff. Pan Am’s instructions are to turn clear along a left-side taxiway in order to allow the other plane’s departure. Once off the runway, they will report so to the tower.

Unable to differentiate the taxiways in the low visibility, the Pan Am pilots miss their assigned turnoff. Continuing to the next one is no big problem, but now they’re on the runway for several additional seconds.
Having wheeled into position at the end, van Zanten comes to a stop. His first officer, Klaas Meurs, takes the radio and receives the air traffic control route clearance. This is not a takeoff clearance, but rather a procedure outlining turns, altitudes and frequencies for use once airborne. Normally it is received well prior to an aircraft taking the runway, but the pilots have been too busy with checklists and taxi instructions until now. They are tired, annoyed and anxious to get going. The irritability in the pilots’ voices, van Zanten’s in particular, has been duly noted by the control tower and other pilots.

There are still a couple of dominoes yet to fall, but now the final act is in motion — literally. Because the route clearance comes where and when it does, it is mistaken for a takeoff clearance as well. First officer Meurs, sitting to van Zanten’s right, acknowledges the altitudes, headings and fixes, then finishes off with an unusual, somewhat hesitant phrase, backdropped by the sound of accelerating engines. “We are now, uh, at takeoff.”

Van Zanten releases the brakes. “We gaan,” he is heard saying on the cockpit voice recorder. “Let’s go.” And with that, his mammoth machine begins barreling down the fog-shrouded runway, completely without permission.

“At takeoff” is not standard phraseology among pilots. But it’s explicit enough to grab the attention of the Pan Am crew and the control tower. It’s hard for either party to believe KLM is actually moving, but both reach for their microphones to make sure.

“And we’re still taxiing down the runway,” relays Bob Bragg, the Pan Am first officer.

At the same instant, the tower radios a message to KLM. “OK,” says the controller. “Stand by for takeoff. I will call you.”

There is no reply, but the silence is taken as a tacit, if not exactly proper, acknowledgment.

Either of these transmissions would be, should be, enough to stop van Zanten cold in his tracks. He still has time to discontinue the roll. The problem is, because they occur simultaneously, they overlap.

Pilots and controllers communicate via two-way VHF radios. The process is similar to speaking over a walkie-talkie: A person activates a microphone, speaks, then releases the button and waits for an acknowledgment. It differs from using a telephone, for example, as only one party can speak at a time, and has no idea what his message actually sounds like over the air. If two or more microphones are clicked at the same instant, the transmissions cancel each other out, delivering a noisy occlusion of static or a high-pitched squeal called a “heterodyne.” Rarely are heterodynes dangerous. But at Tenerife, this is the last straw.

Van Zanten hears only the word “OK,” followed by a five-second squeal. He keeps going.

Ten seconds later there is one final exchange, clearly and maddeningly audible on the post-crash tapes. “Report when runway clear,” the tower says to Pan Am.

“We’ll report when we’re clear,” acknowledges Bob Bragg.

Focused on the takeoff, van Zanten and his first officer apparently miss this. But the second officer, sitting behind them, does not. Alarmed, with their plane now racing forward at a hundred knots, he leans forward. “Is he not clear?” he asks. “That Pan American?”

“Oh, yes,” Van Zanten answers emphatically.

In the Pan Am cockpit, nose-to-nose with the still unseen, rapidly approaching interloper, there’s a growing sense that something isn’t right. “Let’s get the fuck out of here,” Capt. Victor Grubbs says nervously.

A few moments later, the lights of the KLM 747 emerge out of the grayness, dead ahead, 2,000 feet away and closing fast.

“There he is!” cries Grubbs, shoving the thrust levers to full power. “Look at him! Goddam, that son of a bitch is coming!” He yanks the plane’s steering tiller, turning left as hard as he can, toward the grass at the edge of the runway.

“Get off! Get off! Get off!” shouts Bob Bragg.

Van Zanten sees them, but it’s too late. Attempting to leapfrog, he pulls back on the elevators, dragging his tail along the pavement for 70 feet in a hail of sparks. He almost makes it, but just as his plane breaks ground, its undercarriage and engines slice into the ceiling of the Clipper Victor, instantly demolishing its midsection and setting off a series of explosions.

Badly damaged, the Rhine settles back to the runway, skids hard on its belly for an additional thousand feet, and is consumed by fire before a single one of its 248 occupants can escape.

Remarkably, of 396 passengers and crew aboard the Pan Am jumbo, 61 survived, including all five people in the cockpit — the three-man crew and two off-duty employees riding in the jump seats. (Among the dead were Eve Meyer, ex-wife of the filmmaker Russ Meyer.)

Over the past few years, I’ve been fortunate enough to meet two of those survivors, and to hear their stories firsthand. I say that nonchalantly, but this is probably the closest I’ve ever come to meeting, for lack of a better term, a hero. (OK, in June 1984, I played a star-struck game of Frisbee in a parking lot with Bob Mould, but that’s not the same.)

Romanticizing the fiery deaths of 583 people is akin to romanticizing war — something that always repulsed me — but there’s a certain mystique to the Tenerife disaster, a gravity so strong that shaking these survivors’ hands produced a feeling similar to that of a little kid meeting his favorite baseball player. These men were there, emerging from the wreckage of what, for some of us, was an event of mythic proportions.

I was introduced to Jack Rideout in New York in the summer of 2004, where I’d been invited for the taping of a National Geographic special. At Tenerife, Rideout had been sitting in coach with his girlfriend, who also made it out. After the impact, he helped save several others, pushing them through an emergency exit before jumping to safety. After his release from the hospital, a photograph of Rideout — bandaged, but without critical injuries — appeared in several newspapers.

Despite it all, Rideout would soon fly again, without serious fear. His business career continued to take him around the country and abroad.
The second survivor I met was Bob Bragg, the Pan Am first officer. I met him in Los Angeles last summer, on the set of a documentary being made for the Discovery Channel about the 30th anniversary of the accident.
It was Bragg who had uttered, “And we’re still taxiing down the runway” — seven easy words that should have saved the day, but instead were lost forever in the shriek and crackle of a blocked transmission. Just thinking about it gives me the chills, but there’s nothing dark about Bob Bragg — nothing that, on the surface, feels moored to the nightmare of ’77. He’s one of the most easygoing people you’ll ever meet. Gray-haired, bespectacled and articulate, he looks and sounds like what he is: a retired airline pilot.

God knows how many times he has recounted the collision to others. He speaks about the accident with a practiced ease, in a voice of modest detachment, as if he’d been a spectator watching from afar. Of course, the story needs no hyperbole to be terrifying. If anything, Bragg’s ungarnished narrative makes it even more so. As do the strange and astounding details that normally don’t make it into the interviews and TV shows. You can read all the transcripts, pore over the findings, watch the documentaries a hundred times over. Not until you sit with Bob Bragg and hear the unedited account do you get a full sense of what happened. The basic story is well known; it’s the ancillaries that make it moving — and surreal.

Bragg describes the initial impact as little more than “a bump and some shaking.” All five men in the cockpit, located at the forward end of the 747’s distinctive upper-deck hump, saw the KLM jet coming, and had ducked. Knowing they’d been hit, Bragg instinctively reached upward in an effort to pull the “fire handles” — a set of four overhead-mounted levers that cut off the supply of fuel, air, electricity and hydraulics running to and from the engines. His arm groped helplessly. When he looked up, the ceiling was gone.

Turning around, he realized that the entire upper deck had been sheared off at a point about two feet aft of his chair. He could see all the way back to the tail, 200 feet behind him. The fuselage was shattered and burning. He and Capt. Grubbs were alone in their seats, on a small, fully exposed perch 35 feet above the ground. Everything around them had been lifted away like a hat. Only the two seats, the forward instrument panel, and a couple of feet of sidewall remained. The second-officer and jump-seat stations, their occupants still strapped in, were hanging upside-down through what used to be the ceiling of the first-class cabin.

There was no option other than to jump. Bragg stood up, put one hand on the back of the captain’s seat, and hurled himself over the side. He landed in the grass below, feet first, and miraculously suffered little more than an injured ankle. Grubbs followed, and he too was mostly unharmed. (The others from the cockpit would unfasten their belts and shimmy down the sidewalls to the main cabin floor before similarly leaping to safety.)

Once on the ground, they faced a deafening roar. The plane had been pancaked into the grass, but because the cockpit control lines were severed, the engines were still running at full power. It took several moments before the motors began coming apart. Bragg remembers one of the engines’ huge forward turbofans detaching from its shaft, falling forward onto the ground with a thud.

The fuselage was engulfed by fire. A number of passengers, most of them seated in forward portions of the cabin, had made it onto the craft’s left wing, and were standing at the leading edge, about 20 feet off the ground. Bragg ran over, encouraging them to jump. At least one person was badly hurt when he inadvertently tumbled against a searing hot engine nacelle. A few minutes later, the plane’s center fuel tank exploded, propelling a plume of flames and smoke a thousand feet into the sky.

The airport’s ill-equipped rescue team, meanwhile, was over at the KLM site, the first wreckage they’d come to after learning there’d been a crash. They hadn’t yet realized that two planes were involved, one of them with survivors. Eventually, authorities opened the airport perimeter gates, urging anybody with a vehicle to drive toward the crash scene to help. Bragg tells the cracked story of standing there in fog, surrounded by stunned and bleeding survivors, watching his plane burn, when suddenly a taxicab pulls up out of nowhere.

Bragg returned to work a few months later. He eventually transferred to United when that carrier took over Pan Am’s Pacific routes in the late 1980s, and retired from the company as a 747 captain. Today he lives in Virginia with his wife, Dorothy.

Of the other survivors, not a lot is known. Like those from the Titanic or veterans of World War I, their ranks have steadily thinned over the years. Many of the Pan Am passengers were senior citizens at the time, on their way to a Mediterranean cruise. Either way, they are mostly gone now. (Jack Rideout remembers older passengers sitting fast in their seats following the impact, conscious and alert, yet making no efforts to escape.) Capt. Grubbs and the Pan Am second officer passed away some years ago.

On March 27, a memorial was dedicated overlooking the Tenerife airport to honor those who perished there. The sculpture is in the shape of a helix. “A spiral staircase,” says the foundation’s Web site, “… a symbol of infinity.” Maybe, but I’m greatly disappointed that the more obvious physical symbolism is ignored: Early-model 747s like those in the crash were well known for the set of spiral stairs connecting their main and upper decks. In the minds of millions of international travelers, that stairway became and remains an icon of civil aviation.

I’d like to tell you there will never be another Tenerife. Alas, for as long as there are airplanes, there will occasionally be terrible accidents, and some of them will occur on the ground. At the same time, there is plenty we can do to reduce the frequency at which those accidents occur. After several would-be Tenerife sequels, including a close call in 1999 between two 747s at Chicago-O’Hare, and another near miss two years ago at Boston-Logan involving an Aer Lingus A330 and a US Airways 737, the subject of “runway incursions,” to use the industry jargon, is receiving more attention than ever in airline and air traffic control training programs. Most large airports nowadays are equipped with ground tracking radar, and several have installed innovative lighting systems designed to keep crews from inadvertently crossing active runways or taxiways. An emerging, satellite-based technology known as ADS-B can provide pilots with a detailed view of surrounding ground traffic, while inexpensive units are available for VHF radios that inhibit a pilot or controller from transmitting onto an already busy frequency. Getting airlines to adopt the latter has been slow going, but the hardware is standard now in the latest radio equipment.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

During the Discovery Channel shoot, I traveled with Bob Bragg and the producers to the aircraft storage yards at Mojave, Calif., where he was interviewed alongside a mothballed 747. You can see him in this photograph, describing that incredible leap from the upper deck.

The day before, using a flight deck mock-up, director Phil Desjardins filmed a reenactment of the Tenerife collision, with a trio of actors sitting in as the KLM crew. The actors, who in the end did an excellent job, had studied the script well, but it was apparent during rehearsal that none had much understanding of airline flying or how to operate a jetliner’s controls. (Like many people intimate with airline flying, I’m quick to criticize the heavy-handed portrayals cooked up by Hollywood, but by the time Desjardins called “cut” for the seventh time, for a scene only 15 seconds long, I had a new appreciation for his art.)

At one point, to provide the actors with a helpful demo, it was suggested that Bragg and I get inside the mock-up and run through a practice takeoff. A good idea. Bragg took the captain’s seat, and I took the first officer’s seat. We read through a makeshift checklist and went through the motions of a simulated takeoff. That’s when I looked across, and all of a sudden it hit me:

Here’s Bob Bragg, lone surviving pilot of Tenerife, sitting in a cockpit, pretending to be Jacob van Zanten, whose error made the whole thing happen.
Surely Bragg wants no part of this twisted karma, and I hadn’t the courage to make note of it out loud — assuming it hadn’t already dawned on him. But I could barely keep the astonishment to myself. One more creepy irony in a story so full of them, even after 30 long years.

To post comments and more, visit TobyLaura.com

Worried about growing old?


Many people fear death and dying. Death can be scary, especially if one doesn’t know where they are headed five seconds after they die. Pastor David Dykes, of Green Acres Baptist Church in Tyler, Texas, calls death “Moving Day.” Why? Because we simply move from this Earth, to our final home, be it in Heaven, or separated from God in Hell. However, for the Christian, “moving day” is nothing to fear, because we don’t really get old, we just move from one home to another. The following is a great poem that encapsulates the idea that we never truly grow old, our spirit is always alive, it’s just our outward “tent” that we live in, that grows old and weary.

THE GLORY OF AGING
A woman nearly 100 years old wrote:

This old shell in which I dwell
Is growing old, I know full well,
But I am not the shell.

What if my hair is turning gray,
Gray hair is honorable, they say.
What if my sight is growing dim,
I still can see to follow Him.

What should I care if times’ old plow
Has left deep furrows on my brow.
Another house, not made with hands,
Awaits me in the Glory Land.

What tho my tongue refuse to talk,
What; tho I falter in my walk,
I still can tread the narrow way,
I still can sing, and watch and pray.

My hearing may not be as keen
As in times past it may have been
But I still can hear the Savior say
In whispers soft, “This is the Way.”

This outward man, do what I can,
To lengthen out his life’s short span,
Shall perish and return to dust,
As everything in nature must.

The inward man, the Scriptures say,
Is growing stronger every day.
Then how can I be growing old
When safe within the Master’s fold?

Before long this soul shall fly away
And leave this tenement of clay.
This robe of flesh I’ll drop and rise
To seize the “everlasting prize.”
I’ll meet you on the streets of gold
And prove that I’m not growing old.

Author: Unknown

“That is why we never give up. Though our bodies are dying, our spirits are being renewed every day.”
2 Corinthians 4:16

To post comments and more, visit TobyLaura.com

Moral Absolutes


This whole John Edwards affair has been interesting to me. Edwards was forced to admit that he had an affair in 2006. A year later, his wife was diagnosed with cancer, and John lied about the affair until mid 2008, when he was caught by the tabloids.

There is a lot of anger out there at him for having the affair, and a lot of anger is spurring from supporters on the left, as they stick up for his wife, Elizabeth. This is what I find interesting, because a lot of people on the left were not upset with Bill Clinton when he had an affair. That was no problem, the public should have stayed out of it, and it was a personal matter for Bill. So why isn’t the Edwards affair cast in the same light? Elizabeth should just suck it up, right? I mean, this is a private matter for John, right?

In our world of post-modernism, where there is no right and wrong, there is no absolute truth, and justice and truth are whatever each individual believes to be true, there should be no anger over an affair. There should be no one upset at Edwards or Clinton, because what may be wrong for me (affairs) may not be wrong for them! The trouble is, this line of thinking never pans out and fails at the very underpinning of its argument. There has to be a true right and wrong, or there is nothing wrong with Edwards’ behavior. Taken to the next level, Hitler, Stalin, rapists, murderers, child molesters, and the like are all fine, and their actions should have no judgements upon them, and they shouldn’t be seen as wrong because without absolute truth and right and wrong, no behavior can be judged.

The same people on the left that preach that there are no absolutes (are they absolutely sure about that?) and that no one should be judged, are now upset at their hero, for cheating on his wife. It’s in these times that the rubber meets the road. It’s popular today, in 2008, to believe that each of us can decided for ourselves what is right and wrong, but when WE are wronged, all of a sudden, we want there to be some judgement. When it’s our friend who is wronged, or our family members who are wronged, or even ourselves, we throw out all the politically correct garbage and get genuinely upset.

And that is what is happening now with Edwards and his supporters. They preach that there is no real truth and right and wrong is decided by each individual. Until the truth hits close to home — and their post-modern relativism is thrown out the window.

To post comments and more, visit TobyLaura.com

Ladies Market


Today we headed down to the Kowloon District of Hong Kong, to do some shopping in the Ladies Market. We wanted to see if we could pick up some souvenirs and see what else we could see. Click on the picture above to see more photos of our day out shopping.

The ladies market is a few blocks long of streets that have been closed off to traffic, and little tents have been set up to sell trinkets and knock-off watches and hand bags to passers by, usually tourists like us. “Copy watch for you?” “Gucci, Prada bag for you?” It was fun to see all that was for sale, but at the same time, it was sad to see the poor people trying to sell us stuff. There were also legless beggars and deformed people asking for money as they dragged themselves along the roadside. Pitiful is the only way to describe the beggars, and we were once again reminded of just how blessed we are.

The game to play in all these street markets is to haggle. Haggling is something that neither of us do very well. We end up feeling sorry for the people! I’ve heard that if you don’t haggle the price down, you’ll be getting ripped off, and you’ll be offending the sellers. I’m sure that’s true, but when something costs either 10 dollars or 5 dollars, is haggling even necessary?

The trouble is, if you show any interest at all in an object, even to ask its price, they latch on to you and quote you a price. If you say that you are not interested in it, they assume you are trying to wheel and deal and quote a lower price and go after you. The “hassle free” shopping experience in Asia is non-existent! When you walk away, they yell even lower prices, hoping to get you to come back. It’s sad, a ploy, and embarrassing, all at the same time.

For example, we bought a trinket from a girl, but she originally offered us the price of 190 Hong Kong dollars. We didn’t want to pay more than 10 U.S. dollars for it, or 80 Hong Kong. She came down to 160, and we started to walk away, genuinely not wanting to pay that price and happy to let her sell it to someone else for 160. But, she yelled out a lower price and then lower. We came back with 90. She asked us to please come up at least a little more. “Just a little more, a little more.” Her voice was sad and pleading, as if to say “I need this money to feed my kids.” It was either a good ploy, practiced over and over to us white skinned tourists, or she was genuine. We said, “That’s okay, we don’t need it that badly,” and turned to leave. That’s when she gave in and sold it to us for 90.

At first, I was glad to not be “taken” for something that probably didn’t cost her much at all. But then I thought about how much I have versus how little they have. I earn thousands of Hong Kong dollars a month, and am working to not overpay for something in the market by 10 bucks. Would her kids be hungrier because I was so stubborn? Am I just crazy? Maybe I should have given that 10 extra bucks to the beggars we passed. I guess in the end, the lady didn’t have to sell us the trinket, she could sell it to someone else, but in the end, making 90 dollars was better than none at all, I suppose.

We went by the Jade market, where there were lots of things made out of Jade. We didn’t buy any of it, because Laura read that if you don’t know your Jade, then best not to pay too much for it, because fakes abound.

We then headed down to the old YMCA hotel in the heart of Hong Kong. It was neat to see because I remember staying there years ago, in 1984, on our last trip out of Indonesia, heading back to the U.S. for the last time.

Finally, we headed up to Temple street, to the markets there to see what we could see. Again, they close off streets and set up shops so that people (more locals here than at the ladies market) can buy almost anything they want. We finished up with dinner at the Spaghetti House for some pasta dinner.

Going downtown here in Hong Kong is always amazing and my pictures never do the city justice. The sounds, the smells, the shear volume of people, the neon signs, the busses, the traffic, the heat, the sweat, to even the condensation from air conditioners high above dripping water onto the sidewalks below. The crowds on the MTR can be stifling or relaxing. The food can be great or scary. The air can be cool and clear or smoggy and thick. But whatever this city is, it will always remain amazing and there will always be something new to discover about it, with each visit. I’m taking away a lot of memories from Hong Kong and truly hope that someday, you to will get to come here and visit this amazing city.

To post comments and more, visit TobyLaura.com

Tests are passed


Today is 080808! These last two days have been pretty stressful because I’ve had to take three pretty tough tests. The first one was a systems test over the 747. Systems tests are over the mechanics of the airplane, like how the hydraulic, fuel, pneumatic, and other systems work, and how they integrate together. This is the type of stuff a pilot needs to know to have a working knowledge of what’s going on inside the plane he is flying.

I also had to take a second systems tests covering the differences between the different types of 747s that Cathay flies. Finally, I took a math/performance calculation test to see if I could work the numbers manually. There are four different ways to calculate our performance numbers automatically, but, in that one rare time that all fail, I can dig out my calculator and save the day, I guess. 

I passed all three tests and am proud and relieved to have that all behind me. It’s a much needed hair cut for me this afternoon, and then a short weekend before I have to kick it into high gear again, as we start learning about the emergency equipment on Monday. That part sounds like fun — in the pool working with life rafts, sliding down emergency slides from the cabin door, and more. After that, it is into the simulator — both fun and terrorizing.

The sim could be the biggest challenge while here in Hong Kong, because it’s the toughest part of the learning process. But with challenge comes great reward, and if I keep it up and study hard, that too, will be hurdle passed.

To post comments and more, visit TobyLaura.com

Tests Cancelled


Sometimes spelled Taifun here in Asia, we have a small hurricane bearing down on Hong Kong today. Winds are about 40 miles per hour and there is lots of rain flying through the air in sheets.

There are a lot of glass doors around Cathay City, and because tropical storms are so common here, they bar these doors with special metal plates that come up and out of the floor below the doors. They also have metal garage door style covers that pull down over some glass doors. This city is certainly prepared for high winds and lots of wind. Maybe New Orleans could take a few hints from Hong Kong?

The bummer for me, is that today I was poised to take my first big test for Cathay. The test is over 747 systems, and I crammed a lot last night and stayed up late to prepare for today. My classmates and I showed up at 8:00 a.m. to take it, and no one was there! The storm is a “level 8” which means that local traffic should be minimized and travel in the large double decker busses should be avoided. This means that most people who work at Cathay City, the test proctor included, was not in today. Bummer! Now I have to sit on pins and needles and try and take my test tomorrow. Hopefully the storm clears soon. At least it will give me some more time to look over things and study.

In Hong Kong, typhoons occur all the time, especially in the stormy season — summer time. They aren’t a big deal unless they get to level 10. If they get that strong, it’s time to take shelter. The hotel here is really great, as it has soundproof windows (because we are so close to the airport) so we never even heard the rain and wind last night.

Now, I just have to hope the weather improves so I can get my test out of the way.

To post comments and more, visit TobyLaura.com

Low Approach


Enough of talking about Hong Kong for a little while. Let’s talk about awesome low approaches into St. Martin airport, SXM, in the Caribbean. It is a famous airport for large airplanes and low approaches. It is a tiny island, and the runway is only 7,200 feet long.

SXM is a favorite visiting spot for many from the Netherlands and France, two countries that share ownership of the island. There is such demand for flights into SXM, that both Air France and KLM fly large aircraft into that small airport, because of the popularity of the island. This is a great combination for large airplanes close to the ground because of the size of the plane and the length of the runway. 

Planes cross over the beach with sometimes 10-15 foot clearances over the heads of the sun bathers on the beach! I’m in training to fly the 747, pictured above, and the close proximity to the people on the beach shows just how big the plane really is, and how amazing this approach is. Too bad that Cathay doesn’t fly there!

This YouTube video below, is one of the best I’ve ever seen, of any landing in SXM. The picture at the top of the post shows the landing from another angle. Just look at how close the landing gear come to the fence next to the road, which runs next to the runway. In the picture above, you can see two white specks — those are two guys who just had the plane cross over their heads, and I’ll bet their looking for a bathroom! Just a little bit low by the pilot means a huge crash and certain death to anyone standing that close to the fence. To dispel any rumors, there have been no major crashes at St. Martin.

There are a couple bars that are close to the runway on the beach, and I can imaging how cool it would be to sit there drinking a cool drink and watching jumbo jets pass by just a few hundred feet away.

Normally, planes try to touch down 1,000 feet down the runway, marked off by runway markings. Here in SXM, the runway is too short to do that, but landing beyond the runway threshold is always a must — the threshold being a white painted line or bar across the runway. But, some of these guys touch down prior to the runway, in the run-up area, marked off by yellow lines, seen above. Pretty wild and pretty cool.

Below will be the best landing I’ve ever seen in SXM. Enjoy

To post comments and more, visit TobyLaura.com