Want one? Click on the picture to go to the order page. (However, it should probably read: “Honk if I’m paying your mortgage.”) Laura and I have stopped paying our mortgage. Why pay for it when we can have tax payers pay for it? :o)
Category Archives: Politics
Wealth Distribution
I keep up with a great blog by Dr. David Dykes and wanted to share a quote from one of his posts:
“You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the wealthy out of freedom.
What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.
The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.
When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is about the end of any nation.
You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.”
— Dr. Adrian Rogers, 1931-2005
Michael Ramirez
Color Blind?
How are we not looking at skin color when this historic presidency is historic only because of skin color? Why do we champion being color blind, and then participate in monumental pomp and circumstance (to the tune of $150 million dollars, much of which is tax dollars) because we see Barack in color?
I am all for showing the rest of the world that we as a nation have moved beyond our racist past. However, the bigger deal we make about Obama being black, the less sincere we sound in “moving past race.” Some would say that the simple fact that Obama was elected shows that we are color blind, but I find that strains credulity with all the hype over his skin color. Would he have defeated Hillary Clinton if he were white? No. The truth is, we have judged Obama (maybe unfairly) by the color of his skin, not the content of his character.
The road ahead of him in the White House is certainly not paved with gold, and the monumental task of solving America’s problems will definitely not be an easy one – I sure wouldn’t want the job right now. But Obama has little to fear. His darlings in the media and his liberal friends who voted for him will make sure that he doesn’t take the fall for any ills that remain after his departure. Why? Because they are judging him by the color of his skin, and don’t want the first black president to fail. My hope is that someday, we will honor Dr. King by truly judging character content instead of skin color.
(Click Obama’s picture for a great article about this by Juan Williams)
Financial crisis (?) perspective
The following article is from GetRichSlowly.org and can provide some great perspective during this financial “crisis” we find ourselves in today.
John D. Rockefeller founded the Standard Oil company in 1870. He was the first American billionaire and one of the richest men to ever live. I am sure many people today wish they could have walked in his shoes. If, somehow they could, I think some would find it to be eye-opening.
Are you richer than John D. Rockefeller?
As wealthy as he was, Rockefeller might have had anything that money could buy. But what a few hundred dollars may buy today, couldn’t be bought with millions 150 years ago.
Today, we have central heating and air conditioning, cars, planes, Tempur-Pedic mattresses, iPods, and millions of other gadgets. Even Rockefeller in his day couldn’t buy air conditioning. Maybe he had fifteen people fanning him on a hot summer’s day (because he could afford it), but I would rather have air conditioning. He probably had chauffeurs to take him by horse and buggy all around town, but I would much rather be riding in a ten-year-old Chevy. Wouldn’t you?
“It’s not having what you want, It’s wanting what you’ve got.” — Sheryl Crow
To post comments and more, visit TobyLaura.com
Bar Stool Economics
Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:
The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.
So, that’s what they decided to do.
The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until on day, the owner threw them a curve. “Since you are all such good customers,” he said, “I’m going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20.”Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.
The group s till wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men – the paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone woul d get his ‘fair share?’ They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody’s share, then
the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man’s bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.
And so:
The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).
The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).
Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.
“I only got a dollar out of the $20,”declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man,” but he got $10!”
“Yeah, that’s right,” exclaimed the fifth man. “I only saved a dollar, too. It’s unfair that he got ten times more than I!”
“That’s true!!” shouted the seventh man. “Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!”
“Wait a minute,” yelled the first four men in unison. “We didn’t get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!”
The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.
The next night the tenth man didn’t show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn’t have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!
And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.
For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.
David R. Kamerschen, Ph.D.
Professor of Economics
University of Georgia
This obviously pokes fun at our tax system. Though not 100% accurate, I feel it is a good reminder about our tax system, during this election cycle. For even more on the fact that the rich pay all the taxes, thus the rich need the tax breaks, go here. What do you think?
To post comments and more, visit TobyLaura.com
Can terror cause this?
If terrorists get their way, could our capital look like this?
If this happens, will your retirement investments survive?
Do you have enough savings to get you and your family past this type of event?
Wouldn’t you rather have gold in your retirement fund, instead of valueless paper stocks, at this point?
Pray for America. The terrorists won’t stop until our Capital Rotunda looks like this!
To post comments and more, visit TobyLaura.com